On the work that drags
Tests, refactors, boilerplate, bug triage — the grunt work gets done in minutes, so your team spends its hours on the problems only they can solve.
It reads the repo, writes the change, runs the tests, hands back a diff — for every engineer, at a flat $35 a seat. No per-token bill, no surprise invoice, no metering roulette.
The good agentic tools are billed in dollars, per token — so you ration them to a senior few and still get a scary invoice. Pulso is one flat seat: arm everyone, and know the bill before the month starts.
Arm your team ↗You don't buy a diff. You buy throughput, predictability, and leverage on the team you already have.
Tests, refactors, boilerplate, bug triage — the grunt work gets done in minutes, so your team spends its hours on the problems only they can solve.
Flat per seat, no token meter. Forecast the spend for 10 engineers or 500 without a usage spreadsheet — and roll it out to all of them.
One rollout, every repo, in the editors your team already uses. No retraining, no migration, no six-month platform project.
The fair question about a low price: is it any good? It's a real agent that closes the task — not a budget autocomplete.
Finds the bug, writes the fix, runs the tests, hands back a diff — the whole task, not the next line.
Repo-aware. It follows the change through every file it touches, not just the one under your cursor.
Every change is gated by your test suite before you see it. If it can't make tests pass, it tells you — it doesn't fake a fix.
VS Code, JetBrains, Zed, the CLI. Drops into the workflow your team already has — no new tool to learn.
Anyone can bolt a search index onto an editor. The hard part is the rest: an agent that closes the task, inference cheap enough to give everyone, and the controls a real org needs. That's what Pulso runs for you.
It finds the relevant code, edits across files, runs the tests, and hands back a diff. Retrieval keeps context tight — the agent does the work.
A coding model served on dedicated, densely-packed GPUs — tuned so a whole team runs all day on a flat seat, not a per-token meter.
Per-developer indexes, SSO, audit, and central admin — the layer a single open-source tool on a laptop will never give you.
Retrieval narrows context → dense serving → why a whole team fits on a flat seat.
Per-token pricing punishes your heaviest, most productive engineers — the ones who'd get the most from agentic coding. Pulso runs on dedicated capacity at a flat seat price, so usage never turns into a surprise invoice.
Illustrative, 2026 list pricing. API per-M-tok: Opus 4.8 $5/$25, GPT-5.5 $5/$30, Sonnet 4.6 $3/$15. Seat tools: Cursor Teams $40/seat + usage-based billing (Ultra ~$200/mo); Copilot Enterprise ~$60 + AI-credit usage. Real spend varies — book a demo and we'll model yours.
Flat. Predictable. The whole team on agentic coding for about a dollar a day per seat.
Dedicated capacity for large teams. Volume pricing, SLAs, SSO.
A 30-minute call. Live. In front of you.
Book your demo ↗